Assistants of Members of the European Parliament are looking forward to the new legislative period, as a new rule grants them the status of an official employee of the EP. The legal certainty however, comes at a huge price, as official staff members; they now have to undergo a medical examination which includes a questionnaire that has been likened to that of a blood donation bank.Impertinent questions
The form is divided into four parts. First the standard personal data, which is needed by every employer: name, nationality, address and so forth. If one turns the page though, the form takes your breath away. Questions regarding family medical history: “Has any member of your family suffered from cancer […] or a mental illness (schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, depression…)?” It keeps getting better and better. Subsequently one is questioned regarding one’s personal medical record. Some extracts: “Have you suffered from any of the following diseases or disorders:”
* Hepatitis
* urinary tract disease
* depression
* sexual transmitting diseases
* tumors, cancer
* and so forth
On the next page questions relate to one’s personal life conduct:
* Did you lose or gain weight in the last three years? How much?
* Do you smoke? If yes, do you smoke cigarettes, pipe or cigars?
* What is your daily/weekly consumption of alcohol?
* Do you partake in sports? Which kind?
* For women: please indicate the date of your last period.
The background
With the collected data the institution wishes to find out about the “physical fitness of staff members” to “protect his/her health”, as indicated in the questionnaire. The actual reason to a lesser extent is to protect the administration’s cost-benefit analysis. If an assistant is not available, due to illness, pregnancy or disablement, a replacement has to be found and that is expensive. Of course any employer would like to prevent these situations and a lot of people would like to use such questionnaires, but by law only questions which are directly connected to the professional qualifications are allowed.
The parliament tolerates betrayal of its own principles
The strengthening of data and consumer protection was one of the great accomplishments of the EP but now it appears as if an obvious abuse in the very same house is not bothering anyone. The first reaction came from Cornelia Ernst, Member of the European Parliament for the German left-wing party ’Die Linke’, who last December called on the assistants to refrain from filling out the questionnaire. The reproaches however have been known since 2008, which at that time the European Data Protection Supervisor Peter Hustinx noted in a report that the questionnaire should be revised with regard to relevance and appropriateness. In addition to such recommendations, a more precise and reasonable point in time for the deletion of the data would have to be defined. Currently this date is named as after 30 years.
The form is divided into four parts. First the standard personal data, which is needed by every employer: name, nationality, address and so forth. If one turns the page though, the form takes your breath away. Questions regarding family medical history: “Has any member of your family suffered from cancer […] or a mental illness (schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, depression…)?” It keeps getting better and better. Subsequently one is questioned regarding one’s personal medical record. Some extracts: “Have you suffered from any of the following diseases or disorders:”
* Hepatitis
* urinary tract disease
* depression
* sexual transmitting diseases
* tumors, cancer
* and so forth
On the next page questions relate to one’s personal life conduct:
* Did you lose or gain weight in the last three years? How much?
* Do you smoke? If yes, do you smoke cigarettes, pipe or cigars?
* What is your daily/weekly consumption of alcohol?
* Do you partake in sports? Which kind?
* For women: please indicate the date of your last period.
The background
With the collected data the institution wishes to find out about the “physical fitness of staff members” to “protect his/her health”, as indicated in the questionnaire. The actual reason to a lesser extent is to protect the administration’s cost-benefit analysis. If an assistant is not available, due to illness, pregnancy or disablement, a replacement has to be found and that is expensive. Of course any employer would like to prevent these situations and a lot of people would like to use such questionnaires, but by law only questions which are directly connected to the professional qualifications are allowed.
The parliament tolerates betrayal of its own principles
The strengthening of data and consumer protection was one of the great accomplishments of the EP but now it appears as if an obvious abuse in the very same house is not bothering anyone. The first reaction came from Cornelia Ernst, Member of the European Parliament for the German left-wing party ’Die Linke’, who last December called on the assistants to refrain from filling out the questionnaire. The reproaches however have been known since 2008, which at that time the European Data Protection Supervisor Peter Hustinx noted in a report that the questionnaire should be revised with regard to relevance and appropriateness. In addition to such recommendations, a more precise and reasonable point in time for the deletion of the data would have to be defined. Currently this date is named as after 30 years.
Original publicado en Le Taurillon, bajo licencia Creative Commons.
Marcar como favorito
Favoritos
Enviar por e-mail
Trackback(0)
TrackBack para esta entradaComentarios (1)
RSS de los comentarios
denmadrid
said:
 |
 It's an outrageous invasion of privacy that cannot justify any probability of 'cost-benefit analysis'. Not only it is poorly developed, inept, incompetent and poorly 'translated', but it is personally ofensive...... even to males, >>> even to young males, >>>>> even to older males...... not to speak of all females,>>>>> young females, >>>>>> older females. The lowest common denominator of the mediocracy installed as bureaucracy, at all administration levels, is AN OUTRAGE! and this is just one single consequence of millions of myopic 'experts'. |
|
report abuse
no me gusta
me gusta
|
Escribir comentario
| < Prev | Próximo > |
|---|
